Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135814›Full record

ReviewBMC women's health2026

Giant endometrioma of the canal of nuck mimicking a vulvar mass: a rare case and narrative review.

Lateefa O Aldakhil

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lateefa O AldakhilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, PO box 245-634, Riyadh, 11312, Saudi Arabia. Lateefa95@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8339-7469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis of the canal of Nuck is an extremely rare manifestation of extrapelvic endometriosis that may mimic common groin pathologies such as inguinal hernia or hydrocele, often leading to diagnostic difficulty and delayed recognition. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 29-year-old nulliparous woman who presented with a gradually enlarging painless swelling in the right vulvar region over eight months. Physical examination revealed a large cystic mass measuring approximately 15 × 10 cm involving the right vulva and inguinal area with displacement of the clitoris and vaginal introitus. Ultrasonography demonstrated a well-defined cystic lesion with internal echoes, while magnetic resonance imaging revealed a hemorrhagic cystic lesion along the course of the canal of Nuck without peritoneal communication. Surgical exploration identified a cystic mass adjacent to the round ligament containing characteristic "chocolate-like" fluid. Complete excision of the lesion was performed. Histopathological examination confirmed endometrioma of the canal of Nuck. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient remained asymptomatic with no evidence of recurrence during a 3-year follow-up.

conclusionAlthough rare, canal of Nuck endometriosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of inguinal or vulvar masses in women of reproductive age. Early recognition, appropriate imaging and complete surgical excision allow accurate diagnosis and excellent outcomes. This case highlights an unusually large presentation and emphasises the diagnostic challenges associated with atypical clinical features.

Indexed as

EndometriosisInguinal CanalVulvar DiseasesAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyVulvar NeoplasmsCanal of nuckCase reportEndometriomaEndometriosisHydroceleVulvar swelling

Identifiers

PMID42135814
PMCPMC13343631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.