ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
"We're on the journey now together": a qualitative examination of "close others'" perspectives on barriers and facilitators to help-seeking for eating disorders.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders (EDs) are serious illnesses which profoundly impact individuals and the people close to them. Despite robust evidence that early intervention improves clinical outcomes, help-seeking by individuals with EDs is low and long periods of untreated illness are common. Social support networks can facilitate help-seeking, although most research has focused on the experiences of parents supporting adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) to seek help and engage in treatment. The present study sought to explore the perspectives of a broadly defined group of 'close others' on help-seeking for all EDs.
methodsTwelve qualitative interviews were conducted with 'close others' - partners, siblings, extended family members and parents - who had experience of individuals with a broad range of EDs including AN, bulimia nervosa (BN), avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThemes were categorised into barriers and facilitators of help-seeking, alongside the impact on close others. Barriers identified by close others could be categorised into three main groups: close other factors (e.g., limited knowledge/ confidence in identifying the problem), patient factors (e.g., ambivalence), and systemic factors (e.g., restrictive service criteria and long wait times). Close others facilitated help-seeking by educating themselves about EDs, learning to navigate healthcare systems and actively working to reduce their loved one's ambivalence about help-seeking. Close others reported several negative impacts on their well-being, including guilt, stress and frustration, social isolation and challenges juggling competing responsibilities.
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrate that broadly defined social networks can play an active role in supporting individuals to seek help for EDs. These findings should be interpreted with caution given that the sample was predominantly White and largely comprised individuals with experience of AN. Interventions aimed at improving help-seeking for ED should draw on social support networks as one way of improving access to treatment. Inclusive service models, which involve close others in care, should offer both psychological and practical support to help reduce carer burden and distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.