Trial reportBMC medical education2026
Research on the application of scenario-based simulation ward rounds combined with video feedback method in standardized residency training of gastroenterology.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStandardized residency training constitutes a pivotal element of postgraduate medical education in China, playing an essential role in augmenting clinical competence and ensuring patient safety. In the gastroenterological sphere, the complexity of diseases and the need to deal with acuteness of cases require residents to develop strong critical thinking abilities and flexibility. The conventional method of ward round teaching has some limitations, and the scenario-based simulation and video-assisted debriefing have shown that they might be beneficial. In this research, the researchers examine the effectiveness of combining these new practices in improving the training of residents.
methodsThe study encompassed 80 trainees who underwent standardized residency training in the department of Gastroenterology at Dongguan People's hospital from August 2023 to October 2024. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: the traditional teaching group (control group) and the scenario-based simulation ward rounds combined with video feedback teaching group (intervention group), with 40 trainees in each cohort. Evaluations were conducted using a 100-point standardized assessment form for teaching rounds, the Chinese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI-CV, score range 70-420), and a 25-item satisfaction questionnaire (5-point Likert scale). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 29.0). Continuous data were analyzed using t-tests, and categorical data were analyzed using chi-square tests.
results1. Upon completion of the course, the assessment scores for teaching ward rounds in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (87.10 ± 3.24 vs. 80.20 ± 2.30, P < 0.001). 2. The critical thinking scores in the intervention group also exceeded those of the control group (307.20 ± 14.25 vs. 273.03 ± 13.20, P < 0.001). 3. Teaching satisfaction levels were higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (96.70 ± 4.64 vs. 90.88 ± 3.58, P < 0.001).
conclusionThe integration of scenario-based simulation ward rounds with video feedback is more effective than traditional teaching methods in enhancing critical thinking abilities and teaching satisfaction in the standardized residency training of gastroenterology. This approach could serve as a novel clinical teaching model.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR2600124086. Registered on 7 May 2026. Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.