Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Airway management skills and devices on Italian helicopter emergency medical service: a national survey.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAirway management is a critical priority for HEMS teams, as failure to secure the airway remains a major determinant of mortality and long-term disability. The present study was designed to evaluate the variability of advanced airway management devices and medications availability across all HEMS units in Italy. In addition, crew composition and specialty training of HEMS personnel were assessed. As a whole, this survey aims at highlighting areas for improvement of airway management during HEMS operations.
methodsThis observational cross-sectional study was carried out between May and September 2024. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to all active HEMS bases in Italy. The questionnaire consisted of two main sections: Section A addressed the availability of basic and advanced airway management equipment and medications, whereas Section B focused on crew characteristics, including number, role, experience, and training. A composite index to capture "airway preparedness" (API) was designed based on Difficult Airway Society 2025 guidelines. Selected items were assigned a weighted value and the final score ranged 0-40.
resultsOf 55 active HEMS bases, 48 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 87%). Manual ventilation devices, a direct laryngoscope, a complete set of Macintosh adult blades, an end-tidal CO₂ monitoring device, and supraglottic airway devices were consistently available. A videolaryngoscope was present in most bases (39, 81%). Either surgical or Seldinger cricothyroidotomy kits were present in 94%. Medications for rapid sequence intubation were universally available, although sugammadex was stocked in only 36 bases (75%). A physician was present in all surveyed units (100%). However, specific training in airway management was not provided in 37 bases (77%), and 44% did not require a minimum number of prior endotracheal intubations for new personnel. Only 13 bases (27%) reported the adoption of airway management guidelines for prehospital care. The mean ± SD national API was 25.7 ± 7.4, ranging from a regional mean of 37 ± 1.4 to a regional mean of 11.2 ± 5.3.
conclusionThe study demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in equipment, personnel background, and training across Italian HEMS bases. Although only few bases reported adherence to specific guidelines, the devices and medications recommended in the literature for the management of unexpected difficult airways were widely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.