Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135788›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

The use of objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) by nurse educators at a university in South Africa: a qualitative study.

Maserapelo G Serapelwane, Isaac Ontchebile Mokgaola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maserapelo G SerapelwaneThe School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Mahikeng Campus, Mmabatho, 2745, South Africa. Maserapelo.Serapelwane@nwu.ac.za.
Isaac Ontchebile MokgaolaThe School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Mahikeng Campus, Mmabatho, 2745, South Africa.

Funding

NWU, South Africa, Scholarship of Teaching and learning 1EU0134 OE Code: 3503Scholarship of Teaching and learning 1EU0134 OE Code: 3503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is ongoing global debate about the reliability of objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) as an assessment method in nursing education institutions, and South Africa is no exception. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the experiences of nurse educators on the use of OSCE at a university in the North West province, South Africa.

methodsThe study applied a qualitative, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual design. Purposive sampling was used to select nurse educators facilitating the teaching and learning of undergraduate nursing students. The study conducted two focus group interviews at two selected campuses. Tesch's eight steps of analysis were used to analyse the data. Trustworthiness was ensured by applying the principles of credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability. All ethical measures were upheld throughout the study.

resultsThe themes that emerged from the findings include, among others, the perceived effect of OSCE on students. This was evident in the perceived emotional and psychological distress experienced by students and the challenges surrounding implementation of the OSCE.

conclusionImplementation of OSCE at a university in South Africa's North West province faces challenges that necessitate intervention.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateFaculty, NursingStudents, NursingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaUniversitiesAssessmentNurse educatorsNursing education institutionObjective structured clinical evaluationUniversity

Identifiers

PMID42135788
PMCPMC13344050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.