ArticleHuman genomics2026
Differences in miRNAs profile in pregnant women with preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnant women.
Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive and multisystemic disorder characterized by mild to severe hypertension during the second half of pregnancy. Circulating microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) have been identified as potential biomarkers for its diagnosis and prognosis. In this study, we compared global miRNA expression profiling in serum samples obtained from pregnant women belonging to three groups: women with severe preeclampsia pregnancies, mild preeclampsia pregnancies, and healthy pregnancies using the NanoString nCounter platform. We found that 26 miRNAs exhibited significant differential expressions between the three groups. Based on predefined selection criteria, miR-604 and miR-423-5p were initially identified as up-regulated, whereas miR-3615, miR-99b-5p, and miR-4443 were down-regulated by NanoString profiling. These candidate miRNAs were subsequently selected for qRT-PCR validation. qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that miR-99b-5p, miR-4443, and miR-604 were consistently down-regulated in both mild and severe preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnancies. miR-3615 demonstrated stage-dependent variation, with significant downregulation in mild preeclampsia and a relative increase in severe cases. Notably, only miR-423-5p exhibited the most pronounced dysregulation, showing slight reduction in mild preeclampsia but a marked up-regulation in severe preeclampsia, consistent with the NanoString results. These findings suggest that miR-423-5p may serve as a potential circulating biomarker associated with disease severity in preeclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.