ArticleBMC cancer2026
Construction of a novel signature based on CRISPR-Cas9 screening for prognostic prediction in breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Although advances in molecular classification and targeted therapies have improved outcomes for certain subtypes, robust prognostic biomarkers applicable across clinical contexts are still lacking. The CRISPR-Cas9 system offers a powerful platform for identifying cancer cell vulnerabilities and may facilitate the development of clinically relevant prognostic models.
methodsWe integrated genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening data from the DepMap database with transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA and GEO datasets to identify BC cell survival-dependent genes (CSDGs). CSDGs prognostic signature was constructed using univariate Cox regression, LASSO, and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses. The model was validated in internal and external cohorts. Functional enrichment analyses, including GO, KEGG, WGCNA, and GSEA, were performed to explore the biological mechanisms underlying the signature. Random forest analysis and functional experiments were conducted to investigate the role of key gene in CSDGs signature.
resultsA total of 1,622 CSDGs were identified, and a nine-gene prognostic CSDGs signature (BRD4, CHORDC1, COPZ1, HNRNPC, NUP43, RAD1, RBBP8, TUBA1B, and VPS28) was developed. This signature effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different overall survival, and its robustness was confirmed across multiple internal and external cohorts. High-risk patients exhibited a significant association with multiple adverse clinical features. A nomogram that combined the risk score with clinical variables showed robust predictive performance, and its C-index surpassed those of individual predictors, underscoring the enhanced accuracy of the integrated model. Functional analyses revealed enrichment of oncogenic pathways (e.g., MYC targets, G2/M checkpoint, mTORC1 signaling) in high-risk patients, while low-risk patients exhibited immune and hormone response signatures. CHORDC1 was identified as the most critical gene in the model. Knockdown of CHORDC1 significantly inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of BC cells. Transcriptomic profiling further linked CHORDC1 to oncogenic pathways, including EMT, mTORC1 signaling, and TNF-α/NF-κB signaling activation.
conclusionWe developed a CRISPR-Cas9 screening-based prognostic signature for BC that effectively stratifies patient risk and demonstrates robust predictive performance across cohorts. CHORDC1 was identified as a key oncogenic driver, promoting tumor progression via pathways such as EMT and mTORC1 signaling, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target. These findings may contribute to the development of personalized prognostic tools and therapeutic strategies in BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.