Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135713›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Item difficulty of eight tests for the examination of lumbar movement control in flexion in chronic non-specific lumbar back pain - a cross-sectional study.

Anne Hoffmann, Luisa Meyering, Tom Frankenstein, Axel Schäfer, Annika Schwarz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne HoffmannFaculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Luisa MeyeringFaculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Tom FrankensteinInstitute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L.), University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Axel SchäferFaculty of Social Work and Health, Degree Programs in Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, and Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hildesheim, Germany.
Annika SchwarzFaculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany. annika.schwarz@hs-bremen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) is a prevalent clinical condition often associated with impairments of the lumbar motor control (LMC). A test battery of 13 tests has been developed to evaluate LMC. However, the flexion-specific items demonstrated low item difficulties, limiting their diagnostic utility. Consequently, four new items for flexion were included and assessed for inter-rater reliability. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the item difficulty of both the original and newly proposed flexion-related LMC tests.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included 69 participants (45 with NSCLBP, 24 without). Mean age was 50.5 years (SD 16.8) in the NSCLBP group and 45.9 years (SD 20.4) in the control group; the proportion of females was 73% (NSCLBP) and 62.5% (controls). Each participant completed eight flexion-specific LMC test items, rated as correct or incorrect by a blinded physiotherapist. In addition, participants completed questionnaires collecting demographic data and NSCLBP-specific information. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and group comparisons were performed with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests (significance level p < 0.05). Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses employing a one-parameter logistic model (1-PL) were carried out to estimate item difficulty. The test characteristic curve (TCC) and test information function (TIF) were computed for the full test battery.

resultsItem difficulty of the flexion-specific items ranged from - 3.15 (easiest: forward bend) to -0.17 (most difficult: box lift). Two of the four new items exhibited higher difficulty than the existing tests. Participants with NSCLBP performed fewer flexion-specific tests correctly (mean: 5 out of 7) compared to those without NSCLBP (mean: 6 out of 7). The test battery was most informative for individuals with average to below-average LMC ability (θ range: 0 to -2.9).

conclusionAlthough the newly introduced flexion items showed slightly higher difficulty, they remain insufficiently challenging to discriminate LMC deficits in individuals with mild impairments. Future research should focus on developing flexion-specific LMC tests with greater difficulty levels to improve clinical discrimination in athletic people.

trial registrationAt OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GR2WZ .

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeRange of Motion, ArticularAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical testsInter-rater reliabilityItem response theoryLumbar movement controlNon-specific chronic low back pain

Identifiers

PMID42135713
PMCPMC13251237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.