ArticleBMC public health2026
Injury trends, costs, and lost time in an Australian meat processing facility: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeat processing is one of Australia's highest-risk industrial sectors, yet contemporary epidemiological data describing workplace injury patterns and associated economic burden are limited. This study investigated workplace injury trends, compensation costs, and time lost in an Australian red-meat processing facility over seven years and described temporal injury patterns in relation to the timing of pre-employment assessments (PEAs) and physiotherapy-led early intervention programmes, without attempting to evaluate their effectiveness.
methodsA retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted using organisational injury, compensation, and workforce data from 2018 to 2024. Injuries were categorised as burns, critical injury, foreign body, laceration, musculoskeletal disorder, or soft tissue. Descriptive statistics summarised injury frequency, claim costs, and time lost, and temporal patterns were visualised. Costs were reported in 2024 Australian dollars (AUD). No inferential statistical tests or causal analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 273 workplace injuries were recorded. Lacerations (48.6%) and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (27.7%) were most common. Cumulative compensation costs exceeded AUD $3.1 million and total time lost surpassed 3.6 million hours. Cost increases during 2020-2021 aligned with COVID-19-related operational disruptions. Injury counts decreased from 73 cases in 2023 to 44 cases in 2024; this temporal change is reported for context only and no inference about intervention impact is made.
conclusionsWorkplace injuries in meat processing impose substantial operational and economic impacts, driven largely by high-frequency laceration and musculoskeletal-related claims. This descriptive analysis characterises seven-year patterns in injury types, costs, and time lost at a single facility; it does not assess intervention effects. Prospective or controlled studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and scalability of PEAs and early intervention strategies in high-risk industrial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.