Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135684›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2026

Structural connectome changes as biomarkers of stroke recovery: a longitudinal 7T MRI study.

Esin Avci-Colak, Gitta Rohweder, Riccardo Iandolo, Giulia Bommarito, Ioanna Sandvig, Axel Sandvig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Esin Avci-ColakDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. esin.avci@ntnu.no.
Gitta RohwederDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Riccardo IandoloDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, IRCCS SYNLAB, Naples, Italy.
Giulia BommaritoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ioanna SandvigDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Axel SandvigDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. axel.sandvig@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke leads to widespread brain connectivity changes, impacting areas both close and remote to the lesion. Post-stroke recovery dynamics are not fully understood. Investigating structural network reorganization over time can thus provide valuable information on adaptive and maladaptive neural plasticity changes on a subject-specific level.

methodsFour first-time ischemic stroke patients (3 M, aged 50-69 years) with upper-extremity motor impairment were examined using ultra-high field 7T MRI structural imaging protocols. For each patient, we performed longitudinal lesion quantification and white matter connectivity analysis at three critical timepoints associated with post-stroke recovery: within 1 week, at ~ 1 month, and at ~ 3 months. Using the structural MRI images, we generated patient-specific weighted structural connectivity matrices at each timepoint. We utilized the Schaefer-Yeo and Automated Anatomical Labeling atlases to derive both anatomical regions and resting-state networks based on pre-defined parcel assignments. We examined lesion evolution and white matter connectivity changes as disconnections, re-emerging connections, and existing connections with an increase in estimated connectivity strength over time. We further conducted exploratory edge-level analyses to examine the connectivity strength changes for each patient.

resultsAcross all patients and timepoints, an increase in estimated connectivity strength of pre-existing connections dominated structural reorganization. Temporally, the four patients revealed distinct neural reorganization patterns. Patient 1 exhibited robust structural changes in the late ~1 to ~ 3 months stage, whereas Patient 2 in the early < 1 week to ~ 1 month stage. Patient 3 had continuous network growth, while Patient 4 demonstrated stable network reorganization. In our sample, the somatomotor and attention networks underwent the most dynamic reorganization. Somatomotor and salience/ventral attention regions exhibited increased connectivity strength, and in cortical stroke cases, dorsal attention regions demonstrated decreased connectivity strength.

conclusionsIn this longitudinal case series, post-stroke neural network reorganization appears to be driven by an increase in estimated connectivity strength of surviving white matter connections, suggesting compensatory neuroplasticity. Adaptive changes were most evident in the somatomotor and salience/ventral attention networks within this sample, while the dorsal attention network suggested a more limited contribution to adaptive network changes. Individual differences in the timing and pattern or reorganization highlight the potential need for further research into personalized treatment approaches to promote adaptive recovery.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeIschemic StrokeRecovery of FunctionStrokeAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityWhite MatterHigh-field MRIIschemiaNeural networkPlasticityStructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID42135684
PMCPMC13220373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.