ArticleMedical physics2026
Uncertainty-aware gamma interaction localization and reconstruction in PET.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrecise localization of gamma-ray interactions inside scintillation detectors is essential for high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Although machine learning methods have demonstrated strong performance in gamma interaction positioning, most existing approaches do not quantify event-level uncertainty, leaving valuable information unused. PURPOSE: This study quantifies event-wise positional uncertainties in gamma interaction localization and demonstrates its utility for improving PET image quality through uncertainty-aware filtering and weighting.
methodsWe employ machine learning to perform gamma interaction positioning in a semi-monolithic scintillation detector block with overall dimensions of
resultsAcross architectures, uncertainty-aware models achieved high positioning accuracy. CNN classifiers provided the best planar performance, while CNN regressors performed best for depth-of-interaction (DOI) estimation. Variance- and energy-based filtering substantially improved positioning accuracy, reducing the MAE to
conclusionsEvent-level uncertainty estimation enables meaningful filtering and weighting strategies that improve interaction positioning and reconstructed PET image quality. Despite the trade-off between enhanced spatial resolution and increased noise, the uncertainty-aware framework introduces a new reconstruction parameter that can be exploited to improve image quality and potentially support more reliable quantitative PET imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.