Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135573›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026

Pharmacists' perceived knowledge, attitudes and practice in geriatrics: findings from a multinational multilingual open online survey.

Klejda Harasani, Giulia Ogliari, Luca Soraci, Karolina Piotrowicz, Sofia Duque, Mitilda Gugu, Katarina Stefanović, Marina Kotsani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Klejda HarasaniDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Tirana, Albania. klejda.harasani@umed.edu.al.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-6662
Giulia OgliariNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Leicestershire County Council, Glenfield, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-3619
Luca SoraciUnit of Geriatric Medicine, Italian National Research Center on Aging (IRCCS INRCA), Cosenza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0171-3358
Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-8588
Sofia DuquePreventive Medicine and Public Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-5650
Mitilda GuguPreclinical Department, Faculty of Technical Medical Sciences, University of Elbasan "Aleksandër Xhuvani", Elbasan, Albania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3915
Katarina StefanovićGeriatric Department, Clinical Hospital Zvezdara, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-5858
Marina KotsaniHellenic Society for the Study and Research of Ageing, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-0026

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology AGA-CA21122-4-18281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to assess pharmacists´ self-perceived knowledge or competence of major geriatric topics and skills, the perceived relevance of these to work or clinical practice, and their interest in receiving further education or training.

methodsA survey was developed in English through a co-creative process that involved clinicians, researchers of the COST Action 21122 PROGRAMMING and international stakeholders from multiple professional background. It was translated into 24 languages and disseminated online. Pharmacists' perceived knowledge, relevance, and interest in 33 geriatric topics were assessed using 5-point Likert scales. The median and modal response for each topic, as well as a global topic score (relevance + interest - knowledge) were calculated. Composite scores were standardized by computing Z-scores as (global topic score - mean global topic score across the 33 topics) divided by the standard deviation of global topic scores. Topics were then ranked and categorized into quintiles.

resultsA total of 346 pharmacists across Europe, predominantly women (82.4%), completed the survey. Mean relevance and interest scores were consistently higher than self-reported knowledge across the majority of topics. Polypharmacy and deprescribing (Z score: 2.45), chronic pain (Z score: 1.31), and depression were the top-ranked training priorities. Assessing older people in emergency departments and gerodontology were the lowest ranked.

conclusionAmong pharmacists participating across Europe, self-perceived knowledge in geriatrics was consistently lower than the perceived relevance and interest across most topics, indicating important perceived educational gaps. These findings support the need to strengthen geriatric competencies within pharmacy education and professional development.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeriatricsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsAdultClinical CompetenceEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesEducational trainingEuropeGeriatric medicinePharmacist

Identifiers

PMID42135573
PMCPMC13562129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.