ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Health care professional perspectives on vision screening in older adults who attend hospital following a fall: a focus group study.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe assessment and management of impaired vision is included in falls prevention guidance. However, implementation is inconsistent. We conducted focus groups to explore the perspectives of Health Care Professionals (HCP) on vision screening in older adults attending acute hospitals following a fall.
methodsA focus group study was undertaken with HCPs from a single-acute hospital trust. Semi-structured topic guides were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Transcripts were first inductively then deductively coded using CFIR constructs. Demographic data were collected and summarized.
resultsFive focus groups were conducted with 19 HCPs overall. Six interconnecting themes were identified, mapped to 14 CFIR constructs, relating to barriers and facilitators to vision screening. Barriers encompassed: lack of training, referral networks to manage impaired vision and prioritization of task-focused, rather than person-centered care, in the acute setting. Facilitators included: perceived mission alignment, adequate training, tools, guidance on roles, responsibilities and management pathways, integration of eye care professionals in multi-disciplinary falls care and time in job plans.
conclusionsHCPs were motivated to vision screen and felt it aligned with person-centered falls care, however there were individual-, structural-, and organization-level barriers related to staff capability and opportunity to implement vision screening in the acute setting. Multi-component and multi-level interventions and implementation strategies are needed to integrate eye care professionals into the falls multi-disciplinary team, engage supportive leaders, develop an effective vision screening assessment, define roles, responsibilities, and management pathways, and organize individual training and time allocation for staff to perform screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.