ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
From global to local: ERP repetition effects reveal a configural-to-featural pattern in face processing.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the temporal dynamics of face processing is crucial for clarifying how the brain distinguishes individuals within a visually homogeneous category. Previous findings on the processing order of featural information (individual facial features such as eyes and mouth) and configural information (spatial relations among facial features) have been inconsistent. This inconsistency may partly stem from incomplete separation of these information types and uncontrolled low-level visual differences across conditions. In the present study, we addressed these issues by combining a one-back face task with an EEG-based repetition suppression paradigm. The stimuli were carefully constructed such that visual variability was equated between featural and configural manipulations. Twenty-eight participants viewed sequences of faces in which either features or configurations were repeated, or both were altered, and responded whenever the current face matched the preceding one. Event-related potential (ERP) repetition effects associated with featural and configural information were calculated by comparing each repeated condition with the altered condition. ERP waveform analyses at predefined regions of interest and data-driven whole-scalp comparisons revealed that configural repetition effects were consistently observed at earlier time windows, whereas featural effects were more variable and primarily observed at later time windows. These findings clarify the temporal dynamics of face processing, indicate a relative precedence of configural over featural information, and provide empirical constraints for models of hierarchical face representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42135570What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.