Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135531›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2026

Advancing conversational diagnostic AI with multimodal reasoning.

Khaled Saab, Chunjong Park, Tim Strother, Jan Freyberg, David G T Barrett, Yong Cheng, Wei-Hung Weng, David Stutz, Nenad Tomasev, Anil Palepu and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Khaled Saab *Google DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1427-0469
Chunjong Park *Google DeepMind, London, UK. pcj@google.com.
Tim Strother *Google DeepMind, London, UK. tstrother@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4427-2707
Jan Freyberg *Google DeepMind, London, UK. janfreyberg@google.com.
David G T BarrettGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4678-6691
Yong ChengGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Wei-Hung WengGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-0390
David StutzGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Nenad TomasevGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-0220
Anil PalepuGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-8787
Valentin LiévinGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Yash SharmaGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4165-1881
Roma RuparelGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Abdullah AhmedGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Elahe VedadiGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Kimberly KanadaGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Cian HughesGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6901-0985
Yun LiuGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-8275
Geoff BrownGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Yang GaoGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Sean LiGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
S Sara MahdaviGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
James ManyikaGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Katherine ChouGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Yossi MatiasGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-6002
Avinatan HassidimGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Dale R WebsterGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-8824
Joëlle BarralGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
S M Ali EslamiGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.
Pushmeet KohliGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7466-7997
Adam RodmanGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Vivek NatarajanGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-2074
Mike SchaekermannGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-9680
Tao TuGoogle DeepMind, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-7938
Alan KarthikesalingamGoogle DeepMind, London, UK. alankarthi@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4958-5976
Ryutaro Tanno *Google DeepMind, London, UK. rtanno@google.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-6730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world clinical practice is inherently multimodal, relying on the synthesis of patient history with visual information such as medical imagery and clinical documents. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their evaluation has been largely restricted to text-only interactions, failing to capture the complexity of modern remote care delivery. Here we introduce a multimodal extension of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (multimodal AMIE), capable of gathering, interpreting and reasoning about multimodal data within a diagnostic conversation. To achieve this, we developed a state-aware dialogue framework that dynamically guides history-taking based on diagnostic uncertainty and evolving patient states, emulating the structured reasoning of experienced clinicians. We evaluated this updated, state-aware version of multimodal AMIE against primary care physicians (PCPs) in a randomized, blinded exploratory study comprising 105 simulated telehealth consultations, which included dermatology photographs, electrocardiograms and clinical documents. As assessed by 18 specialist physicians, multimodal AMIE outperformed PCPs not only in diagnostic accuracy but also in conversation quality, including history-taking and empathy. Specifically, multimodal AMIE demonstrated superior performance on 29 of 32 evaluation axes, including seven of nine metrics that assess multimodal reasoning. These results validate the efficacy of state-aware reasoning in bridging the gap between text and visual information and demonstrate the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) systems to augment clinicians in complex, multimodal diagnostic settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunicationHumansLarge Language ModelsPhysicians, Primary CareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42135531
PMCPMC13190284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.