ArticleNature medicine2026
Advancing conversational diagnostic AI with multimodal reasoning.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Model-Based Virtual Patient Systems for History-Taking in Medical Education: Comprehensive Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of pre-visit computer-assisted history-taking with a structured copy-ready summary on documentation completeness in screening for inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a randomized pilot study.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Prospective evidence for conversational medical AI is hard, but non-negotiable.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Embracing Large Language Models for Medical Applications, Part II: Building a Framework for Clinical Stewardship.Cureus · 2026Article
- Agentic AI for scaling diagnosis and care in neurodegenerative disease.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Article
- Intelligence without intuition: a mixed-methods pilot study on reasoning models in musculoskeletal physiotherapy for low-back pain.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Collaborative AI for precision neurorehabilitation: a roadmap.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- AI agents in Alzheimer's disease management: challenges and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Orchestrating generative AI in pharmacovigilance: predicting and preempting the unpredictable.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Review
- Physicians' attitudes and acceptance towards artificial intelligence in medical care: a qualitative study in Germany.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-world clinical practice is inherently multimodal, relying on the synthesis of patient history with visual information such as medical imagery and clinical documents. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their evaluation has been largely restricted to text-only interactions, failing to capture the complexity of modern remote care delivery. Here we introduce a multimodal extension of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (multimodal AMIE), capable of gathering, interpreting and reasoning about multimodal data within a diagnostic conversation. To achieve this, we developed a state-aware dialogue framework that dynamically guides history-taking based on diagnostic uncertainty and evolving patient states, emulating the structured reasoning of experienced clinicians. We evaluated this updated, state-aware version of multimodal AMIE against primary care physicians (PCPs) in a randomized, blinded exploratory study comprising 105 simulated telehealth consultations, which included dermatology photographs, electrocardiograms and clinical documents. As assessed by 18 specialist physicians, multimodal AMIE outperformed PCPs not only in diagnostic accuracy but also in conversation quality, including history-taking and empathy. Specifically, multimodal AMIE demonstrated superior performance on 29 of 32 evaluation axes, including seven of nine metrics that assess multimodal reasoning. These results validate the efficacy of state-aware reasoning in bridging the gap between text and visual information and demonstrate the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) systems to augment clinicians in complex, multimodal diagnostic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.