ArticleScientific reports2026
Biomechanical effects of various occlusal conditions and orthodontic force levels on mandibular canine distalization: a finite element analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ginsenosides for Multi-target Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mandibular canine distalization plays a key role in orthodontic treatment planning, particularly in cases involving premolar extraction. A three-dimensional symmetric finite element analysis (FEA) model with bilinear periodontal ligament (PDL) properties to evaluate the combined effects of five occlusal conditions-intercuspal position (ICP), incisal clench (INC), right unilateral molar clench (RMOL), right group function (RGF), and no occlusion-and three orthodontic force levels (0.98, 1.47, and 1.96 N) on PDL biomechanics. The effects were assessed by measuring hydrostatic stress as an indicator of capillary perfusion and maximum principal strain as a mechanical signal for tissue deformation and bone remodeling stimulus. According to the FEA results, a moderate force of 1.47 N produced a relatively favorable biomechanical response under nonocclusal conditions. Intercuspal position and incisal clench conditions were associated with elevated stress and strain concentrations in the PDL. The right unilateral molar clench condition preserved load-induced bilateral symmetry, whereas the right group function condition resulted in differential left-right biomechanical responses in the PDL under asymmetric occlusal loading conditions. These findings indicate that occlusal loading is a key mechanical factor influencing the biomechanical environment during orthodontic tooth movement. FEA simulations that consider occlusal loading can provide comparative biomechanical insights that can guide the selection of orthodontic forces and identification of mechanical risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.