ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Flexible and scalable federated learning with deep feature prompts for digital pathology.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collaborative learning across medical institutions is essential for building robust and generalisable digital pathology models. Federated learning (FL) enables collaboration without centralising data, yet its adoption is limited by high communication costs, model heterogeneity, and privacy concerns. We propose Federated Deep Feature Prompting (FedDFP), an efficient FL framework tailored for heterogeneous clinical environments. FedDFP introduces lightweight, client-specific learnable prompts applied to patch-level embeddings from whole-slide images. By sharing only these compact prompts, FedDFP reduces communication overhead by over 99.9% compared to standard FL while improving classification accuracy. Extensive experiments on TCGA-IDH, CAMELYON16 and CAMELYON17 show that FedDFP consistently outperforms standard and personalised FL baselines, achieving mean AUC gains of 0.11-0.13 over local-only training and up to 0.10 over the strongest federated methods. FedDFP also converges 2-4× faster and remains effective across diverse feature extractors and multiple-instance learning architectures, demonstrating scalability, flexibility and privacy-aware collaboration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.