ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
A data and knowledge cross-level fusion-driven learning framework for detecting missing diagnosis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis omission in discharge diagnosis lists is common in electronic medical records (EMRs), leading to inaccurate documentation, incorrect Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) assignments, and reduced reimbursements from overlooked Complications and Comorbidities (CC) or Major Complications and Comorbidities (MCC). To address this, we propose a data and knowledge cross-level fusion-driven learning framework for automated identification of missed diagnoses. Evaluated on real-world EMRs from six hospitals across various provinces in China, our model outperforms expert system method, BERT-based method, and multiple LLM-based baseline methods, demonstrating superior F1 scores. Results show 37.8% of EMRs predicted to have missed diagnoses, with 9.0% experiencing altered DRG groupings, subsequently affecting 3.2% of insurance reimbursement. To minimize alert fatigue, we adopted a hybrid approach combining our model with expert system, boosting precision by 6.7-13.4%. We also designed two human-machine coupling modes to demonstrate the utility of our methods in the real world.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.