Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135435›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Insights into pharmacogenetic testing in Türkiye: pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to implementation.

Ugur Balaban, Tubanur Kocaaslan, Kutay Demirkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ugur BalabanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye. ugurbalaban@hacettepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7143-3260
Tubanur KocaaslanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4597-2310
Kutay DemirkanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-5826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing is a key component of precision medicine, supporting individualized drug therapy, improving treatment outcomes, and reducing adverse drug reactions. Pharmacists are central to PGx-guided decision-making; however, their readiness for implementation remains unclear in Türkiye. Identifying current knowledge levels, attitudes, and barriers is essential to inform national strategies for PGx integration into clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate pharmacists' knowledge, awareness, attitudes, experience, and perceived barriers regarding PGx testing in Türkiye, and to identify predictors of PGx knowledge. A nationwide, web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between November and December 2025 among pharmacists practicing in diverse settings across Türkiye. A structured questionnaire evaluated pharmacists' PGx-related knowledge and awareness, attitudes, clinical experience, perceived implementation barriers, and training needs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of self-rated PGx knowledge. A total of 455 pharmacists participated, mainly community pharmacists (44.2%) and hospital pharmacists (37.8%), with clinical pharmacists representing 9.5%. Although 72.5% were familiar with PGx, only 8.8% had received PGx-related education, and 37.8% self-rated their knowledge as poor. Familiarity with PGx resources and gene-drug knowledge scores were similarly low. Attitudes toward PGx were highly positive, particularly regarding dose optimization and reducing adverse drug reactions. However, real-world experience remained scarce, with only 5.9% having recommended PGx testing and just 4% having made PGx-guided therapeutic recommendations. Insufficient knowledge and awareness emerged as the primary barrier to PGx implementation in practice (47.9%), followed by testing cost (26.2%) and limited trained personnel availability (14.3%). Regression analysis indicated that prior PGx education, postgraduate qualifications, and being a clinical pharmacist significantly predicted higher self-rated PGx knowledge, while age, gender, and years of experience showed no association. Notably, 92.5% expressed willingness to pursue PGx training. Pharmacists in Türkiye hold positive views toward PGx but demonstrate limited knowledge and real-life involvement. Expanding education, integrating PGx into pharmacy curricula, and developing national guidelines and implementation strategies may improve PGx adoption and support personalized pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePharmacistsPharmacogenomic TestingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesPersonalized medicinePharmacistsPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomicsPharmacotherapy optimization

Identifiers

PMID42135435
PMCPMC13369997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.