ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance evaluation of fly-ash and silica-fume based geopolymer concrete at different alkaline molarities with machine learning-based strength prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high environmental impact of conventional Portland cement has driven the need for sustainable alternative binders with improved performance characteristics. Geopolymer concrete (GPC), particularly using industrial by-products such as fly ash and silica fume, has emerged as a promising solution; however, the influence of alkaline activator molarity on its combined mechanical and durability performance remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates the effect of sodium hydroxide molarity (8 M-14 M) on fly ash-silica fume based geopolymer concrete under ambient curing conditions, aiming to establish relationships between activator concentration, microstructure, and performance. Experimental results show that increasing molarity significantly enhances performance up to an optimum level. The 12 M mix exhibited approximately 30-38% higher compressive strength, 23-28% higher split tensile strength, and 24-30% higher flexural strength compared to the 8 M mix. Durability performance also improved substantially, with sorptivity reduced by about 26-29% and rapid chloride permeability (RCP) reduced by 44-52%. Microstructural analysis confirmed the formation of a dense and homogeneous geopolymer gel matrix at optimum molarity, while excessive alkalinity led to localized microcracking. Statistical analysis validated the significance of molarity effects, and machine learning models achieved high predictive accuracy (R² > 0.95). Overall, this study provides an integrated experimental-statistical-data-driven framework for optimizing geopolymer concrete, contributing to the development of sustainable and high-performance cementitious materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.