ArticleScientific reports2026
Bimodal mortality pattern in pyogenic spine infection identified from a nationwide population based cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies on mortality in pyogenic spine infection have provided limited insight into temporal trends. This study aimed to delineate the sequential mortality pattern at fine time intervals and, based on these findings, to propose an optimal follow-up period for clinical care. This retrospective cohort study analysed data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database. Adults (≥ 19 years) hospitalised for pyogenic spine infection between 2014 and 2018 were included. Sequential mortality was evaluated in 2-week intervals during one year after diagnosis, and the six-month period-where mortality remained elevated-was designated as the target interval. Independent predictors of mortality were identified via multivariable logistic regression with bootstrap validation. Among 12,538 eligible patients (mean age 64.7 years; 52.1% male), 339 (2.7%) died within six months. Independent risk factors included advanced age, male sex, rheumatologic disease, moderate-to-severe liver disease, end-stage renal disease, metastatic malignancy, sepsis, and the use of antibiotics targeting resistant organisms. Sequential analysis revealed a bimodal mortality pattern, with early deaths (≤ 8 weeks) related to infection severity and a late phase between 12 and 24 weeks driven by comorbidity burden-particularly liver and renal dysfunction. Mortality after pyogenic spinal infection does not decline uniformly over time. In high-risk groups, a secondary rise in mortality is observed during the 12-24-week phase, a critical period that may have been under-recognised in the literature. These findings emphasise the need for extended six-month follow-up and phase-specific management: intensive infection control early, followed by multidisciplinary support for comorbidity and systemic recovery thereafter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.