ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Multimodal prediction for radiotherapy-induced hematologic toxicity in rectal cancer patients.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing the delivery of radiotherapy with artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients undergoing radiotherapy is crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes. Here, we retrospectively collected multi-center LARC patients (n = 464, n = 56, and n = 79) with complete CT images, dose maps, hematologic biomarkers, and demographic information. A Transformer-based multimodal fusion model was constructed to combine the visual and non-visual representation features for HT prediction, and the study also testified to the modality-specific and region-specific contributions to HT. The multimodal fusion model achieved a state-of-the-art HT prediction performance in LARC patients: with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.828 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.820-0.835), 0.757 (95% CI: 0.750-0.766), and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.752-0.762) in internal and two external testing datasets. The initial hematologic biomarkers were the best unimodal risk indicator, while the planning target volume served as the most sensitive region. The study confirms the sole and combined contributions of each modality to the radiotherapy-induced HT in LARC patients, and the multimodal fusion model shows promising interpretability and generalization for HT occurrence, which offers valuable insights to optimize personalized treatment plans for high-risk patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.