ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Predicting dynamic individual out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risks using explainable machine learning: a multicenter study in China.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) poses a significant public health challenge, with limited tools available for dynamic risk estimation under changing environmental conditions. This study aimed to develop and validate an OHCA risk prediction model that integrates individual and environmental factors. Using a multicenter nested case-control design, we analyzed data from 26,145 OHCA cases and 162,160 controls in Chongqing, China, collected between January 2021 and July 2024. By linking clinical data with daily meteorological variables, we evaluated several modeling approaches, including logistic regression, Lasso, ridge, and Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The XGBoost model incorporating both meteorological and individual characteristics outperformed models based solely on individual factors, achieving an the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.810 compared to 0.789 (P < 0.001). XGBoost achieved a 5.4 fold higher positive predictive value than logistic regression at 99% specificity (2.45% vs. 0.45%), with 0.96 sensitivity at the Youden-optimal threshold. These results indicate that the model maintains high sensitivity while significantly improving predictive value at high-specificity thresholds. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating real-time meteorological data into OHCA risk prediction, which may help inform situational awareness and contribute to emergency medical services (EMS) preparedness planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.