ArticleScientific reports2026
The inhibiting impact of artificial facility intrusion on tourists' pro-environmental behavior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the development and management of natural tourism destinations, the introduction of artificial facilities provides convenience. However, due to visual incongruity, these facilities may invade the aesthetic harmony of the natural landscape and, through the "broken windows effect," inhibit tourists' pro-environmental behaviors. Nevertheless, the internal psychological mechanism and boundary conditions of this phenomenon remain unclear. This study systematically explored the impact path of artificial facility intrusion on tourists' pro-environmental behaviors through three progressive situational experiments. Study one confirmed the direct negative impact of artificial facility intrusion on pro-environmental behaviors. Study two revealed the chain mediating role of "aesthetic experience-place attachment" in this impact. Study three further verified the positive moderating role of individual ecological environment value in the "aesthetic experience-place attachment" path. The results show that artificial facility intrusion weakens tourists' aesthetic experience and place attachment, thereby inhibiting their pro-environmental behaviors, while high levels of ecological environment value can significantly strengthen the positive transformation of aesthetic experience to place attachment. This study not only provides empirical evidence for understanding the behavioral transmission mechanism of "visual breakage" in the tourism environment but also provides important insights for optimizing facility planning in natural destinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.