Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135396›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

On the usage of artificial intelligence for identifying main attributes and predicting neonatal sepsis.

Flávio Leandro de Morais, Stephany Paula da Silva Canejo, Maria Eduarda Ferro de Mello, Raysa Carla Leal Da Silva, Maicon Herverton Lino Ferreira da Silva Barros, Elisson da Silva Rocha, Katia Maria Mendes, Waldemar Brandão Neto, Patricia Takako Endo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Flávio Leandro de MoraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Stephany Paula da Silva CanejoPrograma Associado de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem (PAPGenf), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Ferro de MelloPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Raysa Carla Leal Da SilvaGraduação em Sistemas de Informação, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maicon Herverton Lino Ferreira da Silva BarrosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Elisson da Silva RochaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Katia Maria MendesCentro Integrado de Saúde Amaury de Medeiros (CISAM), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Waldemar Brandão NetoPrograma Associado de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem (PAPGenf), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Patricia Takako EndoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil. patricia.endo@upe.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the neonatal period, newborns are more susceptible to developing conditions and diseases due to their fragility of the transition and adaptation to the extrauterine environment. Neonatal sepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in newborns, particularly among preterm and low birth weight infants, requiring early diagnosis to reduce complications and deaths. In this work, we evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence models in predicting neonatal sepsis and also identify the attributes that most contribute impact on models' learning and their relationship with the disease, using real data from the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. The six machine learning models evaluated were AdaBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, Random Forest and XGBoost. Performance metrics ranged from 0.7213 to 0.8548, with AdaBoost and LightGBM achieving the best results, reaching a sensitivity above 0.8197 and a specificity of 0.8397 in all three experiments. SHAPley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed strong relationships between sepsis and attributes such as intracranial hemorrhage, prematurity, CPAP use, TTN presence, and epicutaneous access, all of which were highly associated with sepsis cases. We conclude that the artificial intelligence models demonstrated promising results in predicting neonatal sepsis, highlighting critical clinical attributes associated with the disease and identifying the most relevant predictors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeonatal SepsisBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestArtificial intelligenceHealth neonatalSepsis

Identifiers

PMID42135396
PMCPMC13369185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.