Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135391›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative hyperparameter optimization of object detection models for precision monitoring of cucumber beetles and similar insects on yellow sticky cards.

Kudzai Mafuwe, Rohit Venkata Sai Dulam, Chandra Kambhamettu, Michael S Crossley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kudzai MafuweDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S College Ave, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, USA. kmafuwe@udel.edu.
Rohit Venkata Sai DulamInstitute of Data Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Chandra KambhamettuVideo/Image Modeling and Synthesis (VIMS) Lab, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
Michael S CrossleyDepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S College Ave, 250 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

Funding

USDA Hatch Project DEL00854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer vision presents a great opportunity for improving pest monitoring in agriculture, particularly for yellow sticky traps, a critical component in IPM. However, despite the growing interest in applying object detection models for insect identification, insect datasets present unique challenges, and approaches for fine-tuning model parameters to achieve reliable performance remain limited. This study explores the influence of fine tuning three key hyperparameters (learning rate, optimizer type and batch size) on the performance of two popular object detection models (YOLO and RT-DETR), in detecting pests on yellow sticky traps, with a particular emphasis on identifying cucumber beetles. Results showed that higher learning rates reduced performance across precision, recall, and mAP50 for both models. In contrast, SGD improved outcomes, particularly for RT-DETR, while YOLO proved more robust to high learning rates. Our study also showed that both models achieved comparable accuracy levels, once optimal settings were determined for each model. These findings highlight the importance of hyperparameter tuning for reliable pest detection systems and support the development of scalable AI workflows for precision agriculture.

Indexed as

ColeopteraCucumis sativusAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceDetection AlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionHyperparameter tuningObject detectionPest detectionPrecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID42135391
PMCPMC13369153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.