ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating nano crystal sensor with explainable deep learning for nutrients and microplastic-toxicity detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ANN-PSO Hybrid ML-Optimization of a Hollow-Disk Resonator-Based Photonic Crystal Optical Sensor for HeLa Cell Tumor Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work proposes a simulation-based photonic-AI sensing framework for soil nutrient and microplastic detection. This framework integrates a 2D dual-ring cavity photonic crystal (PhC) sensor with a Deep & Cross Network model (DCN). The PhC sensor demonstrates strong optical confinement and spectral selectivity, achieving quality factors up to 18,244, with resonance wavelengths spanning 1528.5-1824.4 nm, high sensitivity as 631 nm/RIU for nutrients and 432 nm/RIU for Low density polyethylene (LDPE) microplastic detection. The PhC sensor further achieves figures of merit up to 3440 RIU⁻¹ and detection limits as low as 3 × 10⁻⁵ RIU, and stable operation under fabrication tolerances and temperature variations. The proposed DCN architecture effectively analyzes the resultant spectral responses of the different soil elements and contaminants. It precisely captures nonlinear spectral patterns without relying on refractive index as an explicit feature, avoiding classification ambiguity at similar concentration levels of soil elements. The introduced DCN model achieves high classification/identification performance of 99.87% accuracy and near-perfect precision, recall, and F1-score. For explainability, SHAP and LIME are employed to quantify spectral feature contributions and explain individual predictions. This explainable AI (XAI) analysis confirms the physical relevance of dominant spectral features used for decision-making. The performed Fabrication tolerance and temperature analyses confirm stable operation within practical limits. Although experimental validation is beyond the scope of this study, the compact sensor design and lightweight inference model support future hardware integration. These results demonstrate the potential of physics-based photonic sensing combined with explainable AI for intelligent soil monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.