Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135384›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Craniovertebral angle and neck disability among university students with forward head posture: a comparative study of scapular retraction exercises versus McKenzie method.

Heba Abubakr Salama, Eman Alshawish, Shereen Ahmed Elwasefy, Ola Ebrahim Elsherbiny

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07317999 (Craniovertebral Angle and Neck Disability Among University Students With Forward Head Posture), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07317999 nacompletednot on this map

Craniovertebral Angle and Neck Disability Among University Students With Forward Head Posture: A Comparative Study of Scapular Retraction Exercises Versus McKenzie Method

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled116ConditionsForward Head Posture, Craniovertebral Angle, Neck DisabilityArmsScapular Retraction Exercises (SRE), McKenzie Method Exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heba Abubakr SalamaDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Eman AlshawishDean of the, Faculty of Nursing, Coordinator for PhD Nursing Program, Faculty of Nursing, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. alshawish@najah.edu.
Shereen Ahmed ElwasefyDepartment of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ola Ebrahim ElsherbinyDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward head posture (FHP), commonly described as "text neck," is an increasingly prevalent postural deviation linked to extended digital device use. It leads to muscular imbalance, cervical discomfort, and impaired daily function. Corrective exercise interventions, such as scapular retraction and McKenzie techniques, are widely utilized to address FHP, yet comparative evidence of their relative effectiveness remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of scapular retraction exercises versus the McKenzie method in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing neck pain, and minimizing neck disability among university students exhibiting forward head posture. A quasi-experimental comparative design with pre- and post-intervention assessments was employed. The research was conducted at the Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura National University. A total of 116 university students with FHP were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n = 58 each). Group A performed scapular retraction exercises, while Group B practiced McKenzie method exercises. Both interventions were administered for 20 min, three times weekly over 8 weeks. Data were collected using four tools: (1) a structured interview sheet, (2) craniovertebral angle measurement via goniometer, (3) Neck Disability Index (NDI), and (4) Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). Both groups exhibited statistically significant improvements post-intervention in CVA, neck pain, and NDI scores (p < 0.05). The effect sizes were large in both groups (Cohen's d = 0.79-1.69). However, intergroup comparison revealed no significant differences in post-intervention outcomes (p > 0.05), indicating comparable efficacy of both exercise approaches in enhancing posture and reducing neck-related disability. Both scapular retraction and McKenzie method exercises effectively improved craniovertebral alignment, alleviated pain, and decreased neck disability among students with forward head posture. Neither technique showed superior outcomes over the other.Trial registration: The study registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier (NCT07317999) on December, 19 2025.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyNeckNeck PainPostureScapulaAdultFemaleHeadHumansMaleStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultCraniovertebral angleForward head postureMcKenzie methodNeck disabilityScapular retraction exercisesText neck

Identifiers

PMID42135384
PMCPMC13369806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.