Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42135377›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative analysis of energy recovery and digestate quality from anaerobic co-digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes under ambient and mesophilic conditions.

Isa Kabenge, Allan J Komakech, Isaac Rubagumya, Simon Savio Kizito, Hossein Ahmadisedigh, Emmanuel Menya, Julien Lépine, Ahamada Zziwa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isa KabengeDepartment of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. isakabenge@gmail.com.
Allan J KomakechDepartment of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Isaac RubagumyaDepartment of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Simon Savio KizitoDepartment of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Hossein AhmadisedighDepartment of Operations and Decision Systems, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l'Université, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Emmanuel MenyaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Gulu University, P.O. Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
Julien LépineDepartment of Operations and Decision Systems, Université Laval, 2325 Rue de l'Université, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Ahamada ZziwaDepartment of Agricultural and Bio-systems Engineering, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Royal Society Grant ICA\191196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large quantities of fruits and vegetables are lost along the supply chain due to their perishable nature, with factors such as inadequate refrigerated transport, poor road conditions, and limited cold storage facilities contributing to this loss. Anaerobic digestion offers a promising solution for mitigating the negative impacts of fruits and vegetable wastes (FVW). This study investigated the anaerobic co-digestion of FVW under ambient and mesophilic conditions, focusing on biogas yield, digestate quality, and energy efficiency. A 50:50 mixture of FVW and cow dung at mesophilic temperatures resulted in the highest biogas yield of 1,328.4 mLg

Indexed as

BiofuelsFruitRefuse DisposalVegetablesAnaerobiosisAnimalsBioreactorsCattleFood Loss and WasteMetals, HeavyMethaneTemperatureBiofuelsFood Loss and WasteMetals, HeavyMethaneAnaerobic digestionCo-digestionFruit vegetable wasteSustainability indexSystem scaling

Identifiers

PMID42135377
PMCPMC13365426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.