ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based analysis of the relationship between brain lesion sites and swallowing and cognitive functions in stroke patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke-related dysphagia is influenced by brain damage location and cognitive impairment, but its mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to clarify the mechanisms by which brain damage causes dysphagia and cognitive function in 246 patients with stroke using a probabilistic neural network model. Dysphagia was classified as mild (oral intake with liquid and diet modifications) or severe (unable to take food orally, requiring tube feeding). Atlas-based segmentation applied to brain MRI data delineated 121 anatomically-defined regions, including 116 Automated Anatomical Labeling regions (AAL116), brainstem level 1, and white matter level 4 of the Automated Talairach Atlas Labels (ATAL), and the total score of five cognitive items on the Functional Independence Measure was used to evaluate cognitive function. Classifying dysphagia by severity and evaluating cognitive function resulted in improvements in prediction accuracy and reduced the number of predictor variables. In addition, after adding evaluations of cognitive function in both the severe and mild dysphagia groups, evaluations of the brainstem, which had remained a final predictor variable in the analysis of brain regions only, no longer remained. The results highlight the importance of integrating neurological imaging and cognitive assessment in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.