ArticleScientific reports2026
Validated prediction model for in hospital mortality in AECOPD with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) frequently coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is associated with substantial short-term mortality. However, patients with AECOPD and metabolic comorbidity represent a clinically heterogeneous subgroup, and admission-based tools with independent validation for early in-hospital mortality risk stratification in this population remain limited. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, hospitalized patients with AECOPD and concomitant T2DM were consecutively enrolled and divided into a training cohort and an institutionally independent validation cohort from a separate hospital within the same city. Candidate predictors routinely available at admission were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression to develop a parsimonious prediction model for in-hospital mortality. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, and compared with established bedside scores, including the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and BAP-65. Elevated arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO₂), procalcitonin (PCT), and D-dimer measured early after admission were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. A simplified model incorporating these three variables demonstrated stable discrimination in both the training and validation cohorts, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of approximately 0.79, and showed good calibration. Decision curve analysis indicated higher or non-inferior net clinical benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities compared with qSOFA and BAP-65. In hospitalized patients with AECOPD and T2DM, PaCO₂, PCT, and D-dimer were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. An admission-based model integrating these markers showed promising performance in multicenter data with independent hospital-based validation within the same city. Further validation in geographically distinct populations is needed before broader generalizability can be assumed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.