ArticleScientific reports2026
High-precision brain tumor segmentation with switchable normalization in faster R-CNN architecture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor segmentation from multi-modal MRI scans remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of tumors, intensity variations, and different protocols. In this study, a Switchable Normalization-based Faster R-CNN (SNFRC) framework is proposed. Furthermore, by employing the region proposal network (RPN), which uses switchable normalization (SN), heterogeneous data distributions can be tackled effectively to enhance feature consistency. A detection-based segmentation strategy is applied for the explicit localization of the tumor before creating the pixel-wise mask for accurate identification of irregular small tumor regions. Also, a composite loss function was introduced that adds the Dice loss, L2 loss, and Kullback-Leibler divergence losses for jointly optimising all the spatial overlaps, intensity reconstruction, and probabilistic regularisation. To evaluate the performance of the proposed architecture, the subject-wise splits of three benchmark datasets (BraTS 2018, 2019, and 2020) are used. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed SNFRC outperforms CNN, DenseNet, and even the baseline Faster R-CNN consistently, with Dice scores above 93% and Hausdorff distance decreased by almost 1.5 pixels. Subsequent ablation and normalization experiments validate the efficacy of switchable normalization, yielding improvements of six to seven% over regular normalization. Given the training convergence analysis, this model optimizes faster and more stably than the baseline. The framework shows good performance over the dataset it was trained on, and it is computationally efficient enough that it can be used in real-time. However, achieving cross-dataset generalisation and conducting clinical validation are two important areas for future work. Overall, the SNFRC framework offers a reliable and efficient approach for the automated segmentation of brain tumors in multi-modal MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.