ArticleScientific reports2026
LSTM-based early warning system for ceramic firing defects: a time-series approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceramic firing-a cornerstone skill in materials science curricula-presents a persistent pedagogical challenge: cycles often exceed eight hours, creating substantial lag between student actions and feedback. We developed an LSTM-Attention early warning framework to flag likely defects mid-process. Our dataset comprises 1,000 firing cycles from a university kiln, each recorded across 144 time steps with temperature, pressure, and gas flow monitored. Student operators produced ~ 40% defects, well above industrial norms. We evaluated prediction at four checkpoints: 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% completion. At 50%-leaving four hours for intervention-accuracy reaches 79.3%, outperforming Random Forest by 4.9% points and MLP by 6.9 points (AUC-ROC: 0.852). Temporal modeling proves especially valuable under constrained observation. Attention weights cluster meaningfully around the 573 °C quartz transition zone (~ 29% combined heating and cooling passages) and the 1000-1200 °C sintering phase (~ 54%), aligning with ceramic processing theory and enabling instructors to pinpoint problematic intervals. These findings suggest data-driven prediction could support a shift from retrospective grading toward real-time guided instruction, though single-facility data and threshold recalibration requirements for industrial deployment remain limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.