ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploration of soil microbial community: a comparative study between organic and conventional systems in perennial and annual crops.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil microbiota is central to agroecosystem sustainability, influencing fertility, plant health, and resilience. Agricultural practices shape these communities in distinct ways: conventional systems, with intensive chemical inputs, often promote microbial homogeneity, whereas organic systems, with higher organic matter inputs and reduced disturbance, tend to sustain functionally diverse microbiomes. Yet, the extent of these effects remains poorly understood, particularly when taxonomic, functional, and machine-learning-based indicators are evaluated jointly across different cropping systems. To address this gap, we compared the taxonomic and functional diversity of soil microbiota in organic and conventional fields cultivated with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in Brazil. Microbial communities were profiled using 16 S rRNA and ITS sequencing, with analyses spanning diversity metrics, taxonomic composition, functional inference, and machine-learning-based biomarker identification. Bacterial diversity was greater under conventional management, while fungal diversity did not differ between systems. Machine-learning approaches identified Bradyrhizobium and Roseococcus (bacteria) and Lecythophora (fungus) as consistent biomarkers of organic soils. Functional predictions pointed to enhanced nitrogen fixation and carbon cycling in organic fields, whereas sulfur cycling was more prominent in conventional ones. Microbial community structure clearly separated by management and correlated strongly with soil chemistry, and Venn analysis revealed more unique bacterial and fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in organic soils. Together, these results highlight how agricultural management acts as a strong ecological filter of soil microbiota. Conventional farming favored broader bacterial diversity. In contrast, organic systems fostered distinct microbial biomarkers and enhanced functional potential, particularly for nitrogen and carbon pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.