ArticleNature communications2026
Computationally intelligent calibration framework for durable soft strain sensors.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ever-growing demand of soft strain sensors in ubiquitous electronics poses urgent need of device durability innovations to reduce resource waste. As most soft sensors use non-degradable materials, it is important to ensure durable sensor performance with reliable sensing signals over its lifecycle to reduce device waste, yet facing pervasive signal predicaments of nonlinearity, hysteresis, cycling attenuation, and batch inconsistency. Herein, instead of empirical experiments via material or structural engineering, we propose an efficient computational calibration framework to comprehensively address these signal predicaments by utilizing hierarchical physics-guided machine learning (ML) models. Using an eco-friendly carbon waste-based strain sensor as a case study, physics-guided ML models are developed and show both high computation efficiency and learning accuracy in terms of real-time sensing signal calibration of the developed sensor, which automatically calibrates its unsatisfied sensing performance to equivalently linear, non-hysteresis, long-term stable, and batch consistent one without trial-and-error experiments. As final demonstrations, the ML-driven calibration models are capable of expanding sensor's reliable working lifetime for >3000 times than its own counterpart for multiple robotic tasks, facilitating their long-term usages during practical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.