ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2026
Comparison of multimodal analgesia including intermediate cervical plexus block versus local infiltration analgesia after carotid endarterectomy: a randomized observer-blinded trial.
Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective perioperative analgesia is essential to prevent abrupt changes in cerebral blood flow following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We aimed to evaluate whether multimodal analgesia, including intermediate cervical plexus block (CPB), reduces 24 h postoperative opioid consumption compared with local infiltration.
methodsThis randomized, observer-blinded study included 40 patients undergoing CEA. Patients were randomly allocated to either the multimodal group (multimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB, n = 20) or the control group (local infiltration, n = 20). The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous (IV) opioid conversion to IV morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during motion, time to first opioid use, hypertension incidence, antihypertensive use, postoperative nausea/vomiting, satisfaction with pain management, quality of first-night sleep, Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15K) scores, complications, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, and intraoperative analgesia nociception index values.
resultsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, 24 h postoperative opioid consumption was 13.3 (6.7, 20.0) mg and 10.0 (6.7, 13.3) mg in the control and multimodal groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.191). The multimodal group had significantly lower immediate postoperative pain at rest (P < 0.001) and during movement (P < 0.001), as well as longer time to first opioid use (P = 0.047) and higher QoR-15K scores (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters.
conclusionsMultimodal analgesia with intermediate CPB did not reduce 24 h opioid consumption after CEA. However, it was associated with better early postoperative pain control and recovery scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.