ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2026
Current recommendations for preventing residual neuromuscular blockade.
Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) offers several advantages during surgery under general anesthesia because they help secure the surgical field and facilitate appropriate mechanical ventilation. Eliminating postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) remains a major challenge for anesthesiologists. Despite the use of intermediate-acting NMBAs and sugammadex, the incidence of rNMB still remains close to 50%. Although it is relatively easy to distinguish rNMB from a serious adverse reaction in healthy patients in the postanesthesia care unit, the effects of anesthesia make it much more difficult to rule out rNMB in critically ill patients. Although there were no comprehensive guidelines for NMBA management for decades, the most crucial step is now no longer the assessment of blockade depth based on subjective clinical tests or qualitative neuromuscular monitoring (NMM), but rather the appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents, and extubation guided by objective, quantitative monitoring. Accordingly, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care have published practical guidelines for preventing rNMB over the past five years, recommending appropriate use of NMBAs and reversal agents and the incorporation of quantitative NMM as standard monitoring whenever NMBAs are used. Furthermore, with recent advances in electromyography and the increasing availability of NMM, education on its proper use is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.