ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Pressure Injury Preventive Mattresses in Paediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure injuries are a significant healthcare concern in paediatric populations, particularly among critically ill children due to their unique anatomical and physiological vulnerabilities. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pressure injury preventive mattresses in paediatric patients, identify knowledge gaps, and provide recommendations for clinical practice. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Medline (OVID), Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for studies published until December 2024. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and the inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, quasi-experimental studies, and finite element modelling focusing on PI preventive mattresses in paediatric patients aged 0-18 years. A total of 10 studies were included, involving various methodologies such as randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and finite element modelling. Air mattresses demonstrated superior pressure redistribution, reducing peak pressure points by up to 29.2% compared to foam mattresses. Fluidized positioners effectively decreased PI incidence by 2.67 times when used in prevention bundles. Gel mattresses showed moderate effectiveness, while foam mattresses were cost-effective but less efficient in high-risk patients. Additionally, foam dressings were beneficial in preventing device-related PIs. The review highlights the efficacy of air mattresses, fluidized positioners, and gel mattresses in preventing PIs in paediatric patients. A multifaceted approach, integrating advanced support surfaces with risk assessment tools, can significantly reduce PI incidence. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and standardized protocols for paediatric PI prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.