Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42134990›Full record

ArticleGenome research2026

Tree reconstruction guarantees from CRISPR-Cas9 lineage tracing data using Neighbor-Joining.

Kevin An, Sebastian Prillo, Wilson Wu, Ivan Kristanto, Matthew G Jones, Yun S Song, Nir Yosef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin An *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Sebastian Prillo *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Wilson WuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Ivan KristantoDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Matthew G JonesCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Yun S SongDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; nir.yosef@weizmann.ac.il yss@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0734-9868
Nir YosefDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; nir.yosef@weizmann.ac.il yss@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-1225

Funding

Scalable Computational Methods for Genealogical Inference: from species level to single cellsR01HG013117 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Ian H Holmes, RASMUS NIELSEN · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Quantitative modeling of extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) evolution in tumorsK99CA286968 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, MATTHEW GREGORY · 2024 to 2025
$335k
Scalable Computational Methods for Genealogical Inference: from species level to single cellsR56HG013117 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HOLMES, IAN H, NIELSEN, RASMUS · 2023 to 2023
$315k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA286968NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG013117NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG013117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9-based lineage tracing technologies have enabled the reconstruction of single-cell phylogenies from transcriptional readouts. However, developing tree-reconstruction algorithms with theoretical guarantees in this setting is challenging. In this work, we derive a reconstruction algorithm with theoretical guarantees using Neighbor-Joining (NJ) on distances that are moment-matched to estimate the true tree distances. We develop a series of tools to analyze this algorithm and prove its theoretical guarantees. When the parameters of the data generating process are known and there is no missing data, our results align with established results from common evolutionary models, such as Cavender-Farris-Neyman and Jukes-Cantor. However, to account for the realistic case where the parameters of the data generating process are not known and there is missing data, we develop new theory that shows for the first time that it is still possible to obtain reconstruction guarantees in the CRISPR-Cas9 case and in other models of evolution. Empirically, we show on both simulated lineage tracing data and on real data from a mouse model of lung cancer the improved performance of our method as compared to the traditional use of NJ.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell LineageCRISPR-Cas SystemsPhylogenyAnimalsLung NeoplasmsMice

Identifiers

PMID42134990
PMCPMC13262947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.