Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42134833›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Challenges in patient-physician communication: the results of an Angolan cross-sectional study on communicative health literacy and its determinants.

Frederico Epalanga Albano Israel, Ferenc Vincze, Róza Ádány, Éva Bíró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederico Epalanga Albano IsraelDoctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-4726
Ferenc VinczeDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-7737
Róza ÁdányDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Éva BíróDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary biro.eva@med.unideb.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-8147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAssessing and understanding communicative health literacy (COM-HL) in healthcare settings is essential, as it constitutes a fundamental tool of public health and health promotion. Despite its importance, COM-HL remains an underinvestigated topic in Africa. Consequently, the development and validation of a Portuguese COM-HL scale could be regarded as a significant contribution to the assessment of the COM-HL in Portuguese-speaking African countries. Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese COM-HL instruments, to describe the COM-HL of Angolan adults and investigate its determinants.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingPurposively selected recruitment sites within the municipality/district in seven provinces of Angola across the North, South and East regions.

participants1839 Angolan adults from 3041 invited persons, predominantly females (53.6%). Quota sampling was used to ensure representation across key sociodemographic strata. Within each quota, recruitment sites, data collection time points and participants were randomly selected. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or above, Angolan nationality, permanent residence in Angola, the ability to speak the language of the questionnaire and the absence of mental disabilities or any other incapacity to perform the interview. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurement properties of the six-item and 11-item versions of the COM-HL instrument assessed through Cronbach's alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient, construct validity of the questionnaire investigated by principal component analysis (PCA), the relationship between COM-HL and independent variables measured with linear regression analyses.

resultsThe Cronbach's alpha of the 11-item COM-HL scale was 0.92, and the Spearman-Brown correlation was 0.89. The items belonged to one factor, and 56.7% of the total variance was explained by this factor based on the PCA. The mean score was 52.4 (95% CI 51.42 to 53.45). For the six-item version, the Cronbach's alpha was 0.86, and the Spearman-Brown correlation was 0.83. The items belonged to one factor, and 58.1% of the total variance was explained by this factor based on the PCA. The mean score was 49.9 (95% CI 48.83 to 50.97). In both versions of the scale, getting enough time in the consultation with your doctor was rated as the most difficult task. The absence of financial deprivation (p<0.001), the location of residence within an urban area (p<0.001) and the possession of at least a fair health status (p<0.02) were identified as positive determinants of COM-HL.

conclusionsThe questionnaires can be characterised by good internal consistency and seem to be an appropriate tool to assess COM-HL in Portuguese-speaking countries. Angolan adults scored relatively low for COM-HL. People found it difficult to get enough time during consultations. Therefore, it is recommended to improve the communication skills of physicians and facilitate communication among healthcare users.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth LiteracyPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAngolaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAfrica South of the SaharaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth LiteracyPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42134833
PMCPMC13182348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.