ArticleJMIR human factors2026
A Chronic Pain Self-Management Mobile App (Dolodoc): Cross-Sectional Acceptability Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 19% of adults in Europe are affected by chronic pain, which reduces the quality of life. Pain-management mobile health (mHealth) apps offer a promising solution for self-management, but user engagement and adherence can limit their clinical impact. User experience design and research play a crucial role in optimizing usability and long-term adoption of digital health interventions.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the user experience of Dolodoc, a mobile app for chronic pain self-management, using a mixed methods approach that assesses acceptability through a content quality survey and examines use by analyzing overall use patterns.
methodsA cross-sectional acceptability study of the main content of Dolodoc was conducted among patients with chronic pain recruited from the Geneva University Hospitals pain center and through snowball sampling. Participants rated 84 evidence-based self-management strategies by using a 5-point Likert scale based on 5 acceptability criteria: understandability, motivation, feasibility, relevance, and alignment with the related quality-of-life dimension. To reduce participant fatigue and avoid random responses, the 84 strategies were randomly divided across survey versions. Use was assessed through metrics collected over 6 months with Piwik PRO Analytics to observe real-world use behaviors among Dolodoc users.
resultsIn the acceptability study, 33 participants rated the self-management strategies positively across all dimensions. On a scale from -2 to 2, the strategies were well understood (mean 1.47, SD 0.76), motivational (mean 1.12, SD 0.96), feasible (mean 1.01, SD 1.05), relevant (mean 0.99, SD 1.09), and aligned with the dimensions (mean 1.33, SD 0.89). The use study demonstrated that 60% (486/802) of the patients used Dolodoc only once, indicating that long-term adherence remains a challenge. Within Dolodoc, pain tracking, useful links, and medication logging were the most actively used features.
conclusionsThis study highlights the gap between acceptability and long-term adherence to mHealth solutions. Improving personalization and accessibility could increase user engagement and long-term adherence. Future iterations of the app should incorporate tailored interventions and real-time feedback mechanisms. In addition, leveraging a digital navigation follow-up could facilitate user adoption and sustained engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.