ArticleNeuroImage2026
EEG-based clustering shows distinct separation of chronic pain patients before spinal cord stimulation surgery.
Article in NeuroImage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain is associated with disrupted cortical activity, yet individual variability in these neural patterns remains poorly understood. Electroencephalography (EEG) provides a noninvasive means of characterizing these dynamics and may help identify patient subtypes relevant to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) outcomes. This study applied unsupervised machine learning to preoperative EEG to determine whether chronic pain patients exhibit distinct neurophysiological clusters and whether these groups differ in clinical characteristics or patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs included measures of pain intensity and related domains such as disability, catastrophizing, and mood, assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). Resting-state scalp EEGs were recorded from 16 patients scheduled for SCS implantation. After standard preprocessing, spectral features were extracted and k-means clustering (K = 3) was applied to identify the structures within the EEG feature space. Three clusters emerged. Cluster 1 was characterized by globally reduced alpha and low-beta power along with lower theta power and entropy, suggesting a pattern of reduced oscillatory activity and spectral complexity within sensorimotor-related regions. In contrast, Cluster 2 showed elevated alpha and low-beta power, consistent with a distinct oscillatory profile that may reflect altered network dynamics. Cluster 3 exhibited moderate alpha and low-beta power alongside the highest theta entropy, indicating greater spectral complexity and variability in neural activity patterns, distinguishing this cluster from the other clusters and potentially relevant to pain processing. Demographic variables were similar across groups, but NRS "worst" scores differed significantly (p = 0.046). Feature-importance analysis identified peak low-beta and alpha power in primary somatosensory (S1), secondary somatosensory (S2), primary motor (M1), and parieto-occipital (PO) regions as the strongest contributors to cluster separation. Peak low-beta power across S1, S2, M1, and PO showed the most robust between-cluster differences (all p ≤ 0.004), with peak alpha power in S1 and M1 also differing significantly (p ≤ 0.008). Within clusters 2 and 3, multiple EEG features correlated significantly with postoperative improvements in PROs, suggesting potential neural markers of symptom change. Cluster-specific EEG features were associated with postoperative improvement, supporting the potential utility of EEG for identifying chronic pain phenotypes and informing individualized neuromodulation approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.