Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42134144›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Impact of Electron Beam (eBeam) Treatment on Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes of Ground Chicken and Turkey.

Tanmaie Kalapala, Joaquin Esquivel, Komala Arsi, Anna L F V Assumpcao, Geetha Kumar-Phillips, Ruvindu Perera, Sarah Johnson, Han-Seok Seo, Annie Donoghue, Casey M Owens and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tanmaie KalapalaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Joaquin EsquivelDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Komala ArsiPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Anna L F V AssumpcaoDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Geetha Kumar-PhillipsDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Ruvindu PereraCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Sarah JohnsonDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Han-Seok SeoDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Annie DonoghuePoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Casey M OwensDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Tomi ObeDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.
Suresh D PillaiNational Center for Electron Beam Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Palmy R R JesudhasanPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Electronic address: Palmy.Jesudhasan@usda.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial contamination of poultry products remains a persistent public health concern, necessitating the adoption of novel intervention technologies to enhance microbial safety while preserving meat quality. However, many intervention strategies aimed at improving microbial safety can adversely affect these quality characteristics. Electron beam (eBeam) is an FDA-approved non-thermal technology that inactivates pathogens by causing irreparable double-stranded DNA breaks. It offers a promising intervention strategy to enhance microbial safety while minimizing heat-induced changes in meat quality. In our previous study, we demonstrated that eBeam dose at 3 kGy achieved 99.99% reduction of Salmonella and Campylobacter in one-pound commercial packages of ground poultry meat inoculated with these pathogens. In the present study, we evaluated the impact of eBeam treatment at 3 and 4 kGy on the meat quality parameters (pH, cook loss, color, and texture profile) and sensory attributes (including aroma, flavor, basic taste, texture, and feeling factors) of ground chicken and turkey meats compared to untreated controls in commercial ground poultry packages. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc comparison (P<0.05). Results showed no significant difference in pH at both eBeam doses in ground chicken, whereas in ground turkey, pH was not significantly altered at 3 kGy but was significantly reduced at 4 kGy. Cook loss was significantly reduced in ground chicken following eBeam treatment (P<0.0001), whereas no significant change was observed in ground turkey. Color analysis of raw meats showed that there is a significant reduction in redness (a*) for both eBeam doses in ground chicken (P<0.0001), however, no significant differences were noted in redness (a*), lightness (L*), and yellowness (b*) for ground turkey. Texture profile analysis showed no significant alterations in ground chicken, whereas differences were observed in some texture profile parameters at 4 kGy in ground turkey. Sensory analysis revealed no significant differences in sensory attributes, except for off-notes in the aroma of ground chicken. Overall, eBeam treatment exhibited dose-dependent effects while maintaining meat quality and sensory attributes, with 3 kGy sufficient to achieve microbial safety without compromising product quality.

Indexed as

ElectronsFood IrradiationMeatAnimalsChickensFood MicrobiologyTasteTurkeyseBeamGround chickenGround turkeyMeat qualitySensory analysis

Identifiers

PMID42134144
PMCPMC13196546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.