ArticleCytotherapy2026
Impact of blinatumomab and inotuzumab exposure on apheresis composition for CAR T in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Cytotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are increasingly treated with immunotherapeutic agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab. Thus, those who present in relapse for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are likely to have prior exposure to these other immunotherapies. The effect of blinatumomab and inotuzumab exposure on cellular therapy, particularly, cell collection and the composition of apheresis products, is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the apheresis composition of 113 pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies across three CAR T-cell trials spanning from 2014 to 2024 and compared patients who did or did not have exposure to blinatumomab or inotuzumab prior to cell collection. We found no association between blinatumomab exposure and differences in apheresis composition, including total nucleated cell (TNC) yield, CD3 counts, CD56 counts, or CD4:CD8 ratio of CD45+ cells. The apheresis products from patients with inotuzumab exposure had lower CD4:CD8 ratios compared to those of patients without inotuzumab exposure. There were no other notable differences in T-cell phenotype or markers of exhaustion among the subset of samples with extended flow cytometry panels. With the exception of lower CD4:CD8 ratios in patients with prior inotuzumab, the comparable apheresis yield and composition observed after immunotherapy exposure is a reassuring finding, particularly in light increased use of upfront blinatumomab for B-ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.