Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42134095›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2026

Impact of blinatumomab and inotuzumab exposure on apheresis composition for CAR T in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Anna Cantilena, Kyu Lee Han, Yihua Cai, Bonnie Yates, Ping Jin, Nirali N Shah, David Stroncek, Alexandra Dreyzin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna CantilenaCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kyu Lee HanCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yihua CaiCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Bonnie YatesPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ping JinCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nirali N ShahPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
David StroncekCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alexandra DreyzinCenter for Cellular Engineering, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: Alexandra.dreyzin@nih.gov.

Funding

Immunotherapeutic approaches to treat pediatric hematologic malignanciesZIABC011823 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SHAH, NIRALI · 2019 to 2025
$6.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are increasingly treated with immunotherapeutic agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab. Thus, those who present in relapse for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are likely to have prior exposure to these other immunotherapies. The effect of blinatumomab and inotuzumab exposure on cellular therapy, particularly, cell collection and the composition of apheresis products, is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the apheresis composition of 113 pediatric and young adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies across three CAR T-cell trials spanning from 2014 to 2024 and compared patients who did or did not have exposure to blinatumomab or inotuzumab prior to cell collection. We found no association between blinatumomab exposure and differences in apheresis composition, including total nucleated cell (TNC) yield, CD3 counts, CD56 counts, or CD4:CD8 ratio of CD45+ cells. The apheresis products from patients with inotuzumab exposure had lower CD4:CD8 ratios compared to those of patients without inotuzumab exposure. There were no other notable differences in T-cell phenotype or markers of exhaustion among the subset of samples with extended flow cytometry panels. With the exception of lower CD4:CD8 ratios in patients with prior inotuzumab, the comparable apheresis yield and composition observed after immunotherapy exposure is a reassuring finding, particularly in light increased use of upfront blinatumomab for B-ALL.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificBlood Component RemovalImmunotherapy, AdoptiveInotuzumab OzogamicinPrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleReceptors, Chimeric AntigenYoung AdultAntibodies, BispecificblinatumomabInotuzumab OzogamicinReceptors, Chimeric Antigenapheresis compositionblinatumomabCAR T-cell therapyinotuzumabpredicting CAR-T outcomesprior immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42134095
PMCPMC13218422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.