ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
Prenatal Screening Via cfDNA - Paired-End Sequencing Utilizing Fragment Size Information Reduces the Screen Positive Rate for X Chromosome Aneuploidies.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrenatal cfDNA screening has transformed care, yet it remains difficult to determine whether X aneuploidy signals originate from the patient or fetus, inflating screen positive and false positive rates. One potential solution is to incorporate fragment size data from paired-end sequencing (PES).
methodWe use a large clinical cohort to examine the effect of incorporating fragment size information via PES on the performance of cfDNA screening for X chromosome aneuploidies. Within the same patients (n = 118,859), we compare screen positive rates for monosomy X (MX) and trisomy X (XXX) before and after incorporation of fragment size data. Additionally, we examine the rate of reported false positives from patients tested via PES versus single-end sequencing (SES, n = 141,364), which lacks fragment size.
resultsIncorporation of fragment size data from PES significantly reduced the screen positive rates for MX (-49.1%, 227/446) and XXX (-42.9%, 60/105). The rate of voluntarily reported MX false positives was lower among patients with PES fragment size information (0.0033%) compared with SES (0.0085%). No XXX false positives were reported.
conclusionThe results illustrate that the screen positive rate can be reduced by leveraging fragment size data from paired-end sequencing. This has the potential to reduce false positive rates in clinical cfDNA prenatal screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.