Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133921›Full record

ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026

Prenatal Screening Via cfDNA - Paired-End Sequencing Utilizing Fragment Size Information Reduces the Screen Positive Rate for X Chromosome Aneuploidies.

Susan Hancock, Franchesca Liao, Theresa Boomer, Sung Kim, Eileen de Feo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan HancockIllumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Franchesca LiaoIllumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Theresa BoomerIllumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Sung KimIllumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Eileen de FeoIllumina Laboratory Services, Illumina, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.

Funding

Illumina Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrenatal cfDNA screening has transformed care, yet it remains difficult to determine whether X aneuploidy signals originate from the patient or fetus, inflating screen positive and false positive rates. One potential solution is to incorporate fragment size data from paired-end sequencing (PES).

methodWe use a large clinical cohort to examine the effect of incorporating fragment size information via PES on the performance of cfDNA screening for X chromosome aneuploidies. Within the same patients (n = 118,859), we compare screen positive rates for monosomy X (MX) and trisomy X (XXX) before and after incorporation of fragment size data. Additionally, we examine the rate of reported false positives from patients tested via PES versus single-end sequencing (SES, n = 141,364), which lacks fragment size.

resultsIncorporation of fragment size data from PES significantly reduced the screen positive rates for MX (-49.1%, 227/446) and XXX (-42.9%, 60/105). The rate of voluntarily reported MX false positives was lower among patients with PES fragment size information (0.0033%) compared with SES (0.0085%). No XXX false positives were reported.

conclusionThe results illustrate that the screen positive rate can be reduced by leveraging fragment size data from paired-end sequencing. This has the potential to reduce false positive rates in clinical cfDNA prenatal screening.

Indexed as

AneuploidyCell-Free Nucleic AcidsChromosomes, Human, XPrenatal DiagnosisSequence Analysis, DNAAdultFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansPregnancyCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID42133921
PMCPMC13377347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.