Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133905›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026

Multicenter Cohort Study of Original or Substitute Systemic Therapy With or Without Brain Radiotherapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain-Only Progression After First-Line Treatment.

Shuangqing Lu, Jingyi Jia, Kai Ren, Wenxiao Jia, Zhuoran Sun, Ke Zhao, Xuwei Cai, Lujun Zhao, Hui Zhu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuangqing LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Jingyi JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kai RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Wenxiao JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Zhuoran SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Ke ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Xuwei CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9673-4188
Lujun ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Hui ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9422-3886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal second-line strategy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) developing brain-only progression (BOP) after first-line therapy remains undefined. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of continuing the original systemic therapy versus switching strategies.

methodsThis multicenter cohort study screened 889 patients with ES-SCLC. A total of 203 patients developing BOP were assigned to 3 second-line strategies: continuation of original systemic therapy plus brain radiotherapy (OTP + BRT), substitution therapy plus BRT (ST + BRT), or substitution therapy alone (ST). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary end point was overall survival from second-line initiation (OS2).

resultsIn the inverse probability of treatment weighting-weighted analysis of 203 BOP patients, OTP + BRT demonstrated significantly superior median OS2 (14.7 months) compared with ST (10.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.68;

conclusionFor ES-SCLC patients with BOP, continuing the original systemic regimen plus BRT yields superior survival compared with switching systemic therapy. This supports a site-of-progression-directed strategy, effectively controlling the CNS sanctuary while maintaining an effective systemic backbone.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCranial IrradiationLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free Survival

Identifiers

PMID42133905
PMCPMC13440542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.