Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133902›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sperm whales habituate to research vessels engaged in photoidentification.

Hal Whitehead, Christine M K Clarke, Ana Eguiguren

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hal WhiteheadDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-3429
Christine M K ClarkeDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-4520
Ana EguigurenDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife research has the potential to affect the subject animals. These effects can be problematic from ethical and management perspectives, as well as for the effectiveness of the research process itself. For individually-based behavioral research, repeated identifications are often necessary, which can lead to habituation or sensitization as animal responses to the researchers change over time because of learning. Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) photoidentified off the Galápagos Islands became more tolerant of vessels engaged in photoidentification as they gained more experience of the vessels (as indicated by reductions in both the proportion of poor photographs taken and the range to the photographed whales). Thus, the whales habituated to the photoidentification process, making it more effective and suggesting little deleterious impact. Studies of habituation or sensitization should be carried out when wild animals are repeatedly exposed to disturbance from research activities.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHabituation, PsychophysiologicPhotographySperm WhaleAnimals

Identifiers

PMID42133902
PMCPMC13175581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.