ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2026
How Health Systems 'Software' Factors Affect Frontline Health Workers' Humanitarian Response Efforts During Infectious Disease Outbreaks in the Rohingya Refugee Camps, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humanitarian settings face a growing healthcare workforce crisis marked by staff shortages, unsafe working conditions, and limited professional development. Despite being critical intermediaries in outbreak responses, demands on health workers come at a substantial cost to their health and wellbeing. Research on health workers responding to the Rohingya refugee crisis in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, is limited. Focussing on health systems "software" (relationships between people and structures), this study explores health workers' interactions with different levels of governance structures, including humanitarian response governance, the health sector coordination leadership team, and their affiliated NGO management structures when responding to disease outbreaks in the camps, particularly during COVID-19. Qualitative research consisted of 33 interviews and 4 data validation workshops with frontline health workers, and 13 key informant interviews with humanitarian stakeholders. Health workers' dependence on government camp authorities for their safety and public health enforcement produced complex relationships and sometimes compromised medical practices and professional support. Through the support of the health sector leadership team, infection prevention and control training was perceived as a key strength; however, health workers reported limited inclusion in decision-making and being professionally unprepared during outbreaks. These experiences compounded risks to their mental and physical health, and they reported receiving minimal organisational support. These relational and structural tensions undermined worker resilience and patient-provider trust. The findings underscore the need for outbreak preparedness and strategic reforms in humanitarian decision-making that prioritise health workers' safety, promote inclusiveness in decision-making, and embed sustained professional support in humanitarian health systems for future outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.