Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133881›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences & the law

The Tree of Life Synagogue Attack: A Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol-18 Examination of Pre-Attack Warnings and Post-Attack Contagion and Copycat Effects.

Molly Amman, Julia Kupper, J Reid Meloy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences & the law. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Molly AmmanFBI (Retired), Molly Amman Threat Assessment LLC, West Des Moines, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1621-8894
Julia KupperIndependent Researcher, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Reid MeloyFBI Behavioral Analysis Unit, San Diego Psychoanalytic Center, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3826-332X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a retrospective case study of an antisemitic lone actor terrorist who completed the deadliest attack against the Jewish community in American history. The analysis through the lens of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP-18) finds that 72% of the warning indicators were present, including four proximal warning behaviors suggesting high or imminent risk for a targeted attack: pathway, identification, last resort, and energy burst. The case also illustrates the impact of this attack on subsequent violent events through forensic linguistic analysis of Terrorgram and other lone actors' communications. The discussion focuses upon mitigation of such lone-actor violence, including the implementation of behavioral threat assessment and management (BTAM) teams, the use of structured professional judgment instruments (SPJ) to assess risk, the simultaneous and continuous monitoring of both online and on-the-ground activity of the person of concern, the location and speed of movement on the pathway to violence, and disaggregation of the motivation, risk and potential outcome in the case through scenario planning and dynamic management. The authors close with a discussion of pertinent questions for altering the macro environment, particularly online, to mitigate the risk of future attacks.

Indexed as

TerrorismViolenceHumansJewsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentantisemitic violenceforensic linguisticslone actorRobert Bowersterrorismterrorist radicalization assessment protocol‐18threat assessmenttree of life

Identifiers

PMID42133881
PMCPMC13436561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.