ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Understanding How a Digital Platform for Chronic Disease Management Can Enable and Limit Patient Self-Care: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quality of Chronic Care Statistically Mediates the Association Between eHealth Literacy and Self-Management Among Adults with Diabetes in a Shared Care Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A growing segment of the population requires ongoing care and support for managing their chronic diseases. Digital platforms for self-management are rapidly emerging to meet this need, but patients' experiences with these platforms vary significantly. This may be due to the complexity and flexibility of digital platforms, where the wide array of available features can generate unexpected impacts. Objective: This study aims to explore how a digital platform can both enable and limit patients with a chronic disease in managing their own health. Methods: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with patients to better understand their experience of using a digital platform for self-managing their chronic diseases. Patients who had been using a digital platform (the Chronic Care Platform) for at least 1 month were invited to participate. Twenty-four patients were recruited and interviewed in person or by phone. The collected data were analyzed using template analysis, which is a type of thematic analysis that allows inductive identification of themes from data and deductive application of theory-informed themes. We leveraged Self-Care Theory to understand how patients' motivation to use the platform and their subsequent use of its features generated perceived value and challenges in achieving this value. Results: The platform was shown to support patients' development of core self-care abilities (cognitive, psychosocial, and sociocultural abilities) and self-care behaviors (maintenance, monitoring, management), but it did not provide any support to the development of physiological abilities. Moreover, results indicate important limitations in the way in which the digital platform supported all self-care abilities and behaviors-in particular, self-care management. Hence, while the platform was viewed as valuable overall, patients reported several challenges in effectively using the Chronic Care Platform for self-care. Conclusions: Digital platforms for chronic disease management can enhance patient self-care by providing valuable resources and support for reinforcing desired behaviors. However, gaps in platform features can limit patients' ability to comprehensively care for themselves. This study shows that relating platform features to specific dimensions of self-care can help identify missing features, providing a fine-grained understanding of how a given platform is generating positive impacts and how it may be improved to fully support self-care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.